<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Study and Increased Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.originsofautism.com/2009/12/19/new-study-and-increased-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.originsofautism.com/2009/12/19/new-study-and-increased-rates/</link>
	<description>What causes the condition to wax and wane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:48:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Socrates</title>
		<link>http://www.originsofautism.com/2009/12/19/new-study-and-increased-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Socrates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.originsofautism.com/?p=259#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve skimmed the report and can&#039;t help but feel that the results are entirely consistent with widely varying levels of experience, skills and diagnostic practices across the different state research groups.

The report also contains a number of phrases and concepts that seem to have come straight from the lips of non-academic, non-clinical Lobbyists and campaigners. 

I personally feel it is almost valueless as a serious epidemiological study.

I would suggest better founded material is available from UK sources, ie Baird et.al &quot;Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP)&quot; and the UK government&#039;s recent report on adult prevalence by Terry Brugha.

I would posit that the consensus in the UK is that the rate of all PDD&#039;s is around 1% and has been for a very long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve skimmed the report and can&#8217;t help but feel that the results are entirely consistent with widely varying levels of experience, skills and diagnostic practices across the different state research groups.</p>
<p>The report also contains a number of phrases and concepts that seem to have come straight from the lips of non-academic, non-clinical Lobbyists and campaigners. </p>
<p>I personally feel it is almost valueless as a serious epidemiological study.</p>
<p>I would suggest better founded material is available from UK sources, ie Baird et.al &#8220;Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP)&#8221; and the UK government&#8217;s recent report on adult prevalence by Terry Brugha.</p>
<p>I would posit that the consensus in the UK is that the rate of all PDD&#8217;s is around 1% and has been for a very long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
